DOC // NL-TN-2026-010VECTOR -Z1P / 1U · MATERIALS · ORBITAL
STATUS: PUBLISHED // REV 0.1

Passive magnetic attitude control for a 1P: sizing the magnet and damper rods

Restoring torque margin, stray-field saturation of permeable rods, shape demagnetization and asymptotic dead band

Author
nadir lab.
Published
Reading time
5 min
Level
Academic
Tags
  • PMAC
  • Attitude control
  • Hysteresis rod
  • Demagnetization
  • PocketQube

Abstract

We formulate the coupled magnetostatic design rules for passive magnetic attitude control (PMAC) inside a 50 mm PocketQube: sizing the permanent dipole against aerodynamic torque, keeping the magnet's stray field below the apparent saturation field of the hysteresis dampers, selecting rod aspect ratio to overcome shape demagnetization, and bounding the final dead-band angle.

Contents

Why 50 mm geometry couples the magnet and the dampers#

Passive magnetic attitude control () aligns one axis of a spacecraft with the local geomagnetic field via a permanent magnet of dipole moment and dissipates rotational kinetic energy in orthogonal soft-magnetic rods or strips[1]. In a or CubeSat the damper rods can be placed away from the permanent magnet. Inside a cube, the separation rarely exceeds [2]. Because the dipole stray field grows as , an oversized magnet biases the into saturation and stops rotational damping[3].

Step 1: Sizing the permanent dipole#

For a maximum pointing offset under worst-case environmental torque at minimum orbital field (about at the magnetic equator at ) with a torque margin , the required dipole moment is[1]:

Magnet moment for a tenfold torque margin at 10° in a 20 µT field (materials review, Eq. 4)
DisturbanceTorque (nN·m)Required moment (A·m²)
Aerodynamic, ρ = 1 × 10⁻¹² kg/m³1.60.005
Aerodynamic, ρ = 5 × 10⁻¹² kg/m³7.90.023
Residual dipole 1 × 10⁻³ A·m² in 30 µT30.00.086
CSSWE 3U CubeSat, for comparison100.00.288

1P at 500 km: 25 cm² projected area, drag coefficient 2.2, 7.6 km/s, 1 cm centre-of-mass offset. The residual-dipole torque does not shrink with the spacecraft, so neither does the magnet.

For a with a deployed UHF tape antenna, aerodynamic torque at moderate solar activity requires only —a tiny AlNiCo-5 or SmCo cylinder of a few millimetres[4].

Step 2: Stray-field coupling and minimum separation#

Along a damper rod placed perpendicular to the magnet axis at lateral distance and axial offset from the dipole mid-plane, the peak axial stray field is[2]:

Magnet stray field (A/m) at damper and sensor distances, and the rod placement it allows
Moment (A·m²)Equatorial, 20 mmAxial, 20 mmEquatorial, 45 mmRod offset allowed at 20 mm (mm)Rod offset allowed at 45 mm (mm)
0.02199398172.2Any
0.109951,989870.4413.2
0.313,0846,1672710.143.7
0.919,05218,1047950.051.2

Allowed offset: the largest distance of a rod from the magnet mid-plane for which its peak axial stray field (review, Eq. 3) stays below the equatorial geomagnetic field at 525 km, 18.6 A/m.

To keep the hysteresis loop open as the spacecraft tumbles in , the axial component of the magnet's stray field along the rod must stay well below the rod's apparent saturation field .

Step 3: Shape demagnetization and despin time#

Short rods suffer strong internal demagnetizing fields. For a cylinder of length-to-diameter ratio , the Sato–Ishii magnetometric factor[5] and the exact prism formula of Aharoni[6] show that shears the intrinsic loop:

Soft-magnetic damper elements for a 1P: demagnetization, dissipation and bias tolerance
ElementNApparent saturation N·Mₛ (A/m)Peak polarization (mT)Loss per cycle (nJ)Mass (g)Saturated within (mm)
HyMu-80 rod, Ø 1 × 45 mm (1P limit)9.75 × 10⁻³5,7423.70.510.3111
HyMu-80 rod, Ø 1 × 95 mm (1U limit)4.64 × 10⁻³2,7347.92.250.6514
HyMu-80 rod, 0.2 × 0.2 × 33.5 mm (Grizu-263A)2.82 × 10⁻³1,66012.90.0670.01217
Fe–B–Si strip, 25 µm × 5 × 45 mm1.14 × 10⁻³1,41329.82.010.04018
HyMu-80 strip, 25 µm × 5 × 45 mm1.14 × 10⁻³67032.10.690.04923

Applied field amplitude 30 A/m, idealized rectangular loop (materials review, Eqs. 5–10). Last column: distance from a 0.1 A·m² magnet, in its equatorial plane, inside which the element is driven to saturation.

Hysteresis despin from 10°/s (materials review, Eq. 9)
ConfigurationInertia (kg·m²)Damper mass (g)Loss per cycle (nJ)Despin time (h)
1P, 250 g, four Ø 1 × 45 mm HyMu-80 rods1.04 × 10⁻⁴1.232.0326
1U, 1.33 kg, four Ø 1 × 95 mm HyMu-80 rods2.22 × 10⁻³2.609.01125
1P, 250 g, four Fe–B–Si strips1.04 × 10⁻⁴0.168.056.6
Grizu-263A, 237 g, twelve 0.2 mm HyMu-80 rods, no magnet bias9.88 × 10⁻⁵0.140.8063

Orientation factor 0.6, homogeneous cube inertia, applied field 30 A/m. These figures compare designs; magnet bias, non-uniform magnetization and minor loops reduce the real damping.

Step 4: Asymptotic dead band#

Once the angular rate drops near orbital rate, the Earth field swing must exceed the material to traverse the hysteresis loop. Below , the rod behaves elastically and libration damping stops[1]:

Dead-band half-angle below which hysteresis damping stops (materials review, Eq. 11)
Damper alloyCoercivity (A/m)H⊥ = 16 A/mH⊥ = 30 A/mH⊥ = 40 A/m
80% Ni–Fe (HyMu-80)0.963.4°1.8°1.4°
Fe-based amorphous, annealed310.8°5.7°4.3°
Grain-oriented Fe–3%Si, low518.2°9.6°7.2°
Grain-oriented Fe–3%Si, high1038.7°19.5°14.5°

H⊥ is the geomagnetic field perpendicular to the magnet axis: about 16 A/m at the weak end of LEO and 30 A/m as a typical value.

References

  1. [1]nadir lab. (2026). Materials engineering for PocketQube picosatellites: A scaling-based review and design guide [Preprint]. nadir lab.Read on nadir lab.
  2. [2]nadir lab. (2026). PocketQube picosatellites: A review of standards, mission trends and miniaturization constraints, with lessons learned from Grizu-263A, Türkiye’s first PocketQube [Preprint]. nadir lab.Read on nadir lab.
  3. [3]Santoni, F., & Zelli, M. (2009). Passive magnetic attitude stabilization of the UNISAT-4 microsatellite. Acta Astronautica, 65, 792–803.doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2009.03.012
  4. [4]Gerhardt, D. T., & Palo, S. E. (2010). Passive magnetic attitude control for CubeSat spacecraft. In: 24th Annual AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites (SSC10-VIII-5).
  5. [5]Sato, M., & Ishii, Y. (1989). Simple and approximate expressions of demagnetizing factors of uniformly magnetized rectangular rod and cylinder. Journal of Applied Physics, 66, 983–985.
  6. [6]Aharoni, A. (1998). Demagnetizing factors for rectangular ferromagnetic prisms. Journal of Applied Physics, 83, 3432–3434.doi:10.1063/1.367113

Cite this article

@misc{nadirlab2026pmac,
  author       = {{nadir lab.}},
  title        = {{Passive magnetic attitude control for a 1P: sizing the magnet and damper rods}},
  year         = {2026},
  month        = oct,
  howpublished = {nadir lab. nadir lab. technical note SQ-TN-2026-010},
  url          = {https://nadirlab.space/en/articles/pmac-magnet-and-rod-sizing/},
  language     = {english},
  note         = {Licence: CC BY 4.0}
}
DOI
Not assigned
Identifier
SQ-TN-2026-010
Licence
CC BY 4.0